Buy Yourself a Bit of Casino

There are some companies that are masters of many trades – own soft, casino, poker, bets… Two of the most famous companies of this kind are presented in the market. In June of in 2005 PartyGaming (LSE: PRTY) made its debut in the market – the company that owns the known to all PartyPoker as well as a variety of casinos (later betting, bingoand financial trading, and betting were added later).

The company’s initial price was shares at PS1,350, they saw an increase in price up to PS1,730, which resulted in the total cost for the company of over $10 bln – the highest record in history that will doubtfully beaten soon! After bouncing the Americans at the end of 2006 the expense dropped after a few times. Currently, the shares are priced at PS230 and the total cost of around PS1 billion (or $1.5 billion). Visit:-

The the world’s largest on-line casino (also featuring its own soft, as well as a poker room, and later additional games of luck were added) Casino on The Internet. To be precise, it’s the 888 Plc. Company, was corporatized only after a couple of months.

In the beginning, the shares increased in value from PS170 to PS230 however, the year 2006 didn’t spare it also, even though the impact was not that severe, as for Party. It is interesting to note that the company experienced a serious decline within the early spring of 2010, and now the shares cost PS44 and gives the capitalization of PS150 mln (and it was more than $1 billion).

Factually, there are not many companies, specialized in on-line casinos, which are listed on the stock-market. There are two of them in particular they both joined the stock market in 2005, the year popular for taking on-line companies to the exchange. Both were affected by the bouncing of the Americans (though they were focusing on European markets) as well as the cost of their shares was comparable. In all, the first online casino to be corporatized became the Gaming VC company (LSE: GVC) also than Casino Club, one of the top players in the German-speaking market and also in the eyes of the players of roulette. As with other casinos in the past, following the release of shares their growth was witnessed (from PS450 up to PS870) However, the notorious 2006 and the prohibition on the Americans to gamble decreased the shares multiple times – to PS100. Following that, the shares have been slowly increasing, even reaching PS200, but the decrease in the recent months has reduced the price to PS110. As of now, the company capitalization amounts to PS35 mill.

Our next hero is 32 Red, a company (LSE: TTR), operating a 32Red online casino operating under the similar name (then they bought casinos, and recently, introduced the stakes). Beginning at PS130 In 2006, the shares plummeted to PS26 in the following year, and after the rise, the world crisis arrived with drops in the shares, and today the shares are worth around PS15, and the whole company – PS10 million.

Let’s take a look at the major diversified players in one glance. They’re mostly European off-line bookmakers that have an online presence that is strong and offering not just bets and online casinos, but also as well as bingo rooms, poker, lotteries, etc. Here are a few significant names within this subgroup: William Hill (LSE: WMH), Ladbrokes (LSE: LAD), BWin (Vienna: BWIN), Paddy Power (LSE: PAP). All of them cost the amount of 1.2 billion, but only the first pair is in pounds, and the second pair is with Euros (now, the pound is 20% to 30% heavier over Euro). The companies such as SportingBet, Bettson, Unibet and many more. are valued at a few hundred million. The value of these businesses usually makes the order of several 10s, or a few hundred pounds or euros, roughly. The price of these companies has fluctuated significantly over the last years, though 2006 had no significant impact on the cost of these companies shares, as they were originally focusing on Europe and the predominant portion of the cost is comprised of the off-line part of the business. For a while, Paddy Power and Bettson have had not bad results among the mentioned companies, despite the crises.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *